Cheap Labour

Canada, the so-called land of opportunities. This statement is a known fact due to the large amount of people immigrating to our country. It all started back in the 50's and is still occurring in the 90's. I will be discussing the different working mentalities between French Canadians and immigrants coming from various parts of the world. I will compare "Voiceless People" by Marco Micone, and White Niggers of America by Pierre Vallieres. White Niggers emphasizes on the mentality of French Canadian working class and Voiceless People emphasizes on immigrant's mentality towards working, which in this case is the Italian community. After reading "Rivalry Over the Ethnic Minorities", it was like reading my own family's past when they immigrated in Quebec back in the early 70's. Many Greek immigrants who immigrated from their native country followed the same pattern towards finding happiness. Like most of the French, they worked long hard hours in bad working conditions and not so great pay. These sweatshops represent the first act of action to climb up the social ladder. But for the immigrants, it meant much more: they have these jobs in order to save up some money for the future, by a nice house and reach the next step in social ladder. Most of the time, the immigrants would buy their home in other neighborhoods; they would change community because it reflected their new social situation. Because they have more money, they can move to an area where people of the same nationality live. They will leave the French back in the city where they will keep on working long hours because they never saved up or invested their money. The main point I'm trying to show is that the immigrants have a stronger ambition and desire to become more successful than the French do, maybe because they are not at home and threatened by others. This is the world view almost all immigrants have and this concept has a major effect on their lives. Voiceless People is exactly the same scenario for Antonio and his family. Antonio came here very poor and unable to speak a word of French. He started working in factories with very bad pay and even worse working conditions. Just like the typical immigrant, he never gave up, didn't let anyone put him down, continued to work because he had an ambition to become successful and buy a house knowing that he earned it with his own sweat. As a newcomer to this country, he seemed to succeed with great facility, unlike many French Canadians who seem somehow jealous of the immigrants who tend to succeed with such bad circumstances. This cycle seemed very effective for many immigrants and still is. Many don't have a choice, they must work like slaves for several years and save almost all their earnings in order to hopefully go up the corporate ladder. Many do this very rapidly, often in only one generation from practically slavery to a professional job and respected positions. The ratio of immigrants going through the cycle described above is much higher than the ratio of French Canadian going through the same thing. Like the Rossis and many other Italians, they show more desire to achieve wealth. Now, the mentality issued in White Niggers illustrates the French working class. It represents the Vallieres family and the hardship they were living the 40's. Vallieres' father was still working long dreadful hours when he was only 13. This means that he hadn't saved up enough money to be able to decrease his working hours; therefore he couldn't even spend more time with his family. Also, education was not similar when comparing the two stories. For example, education plays a big role according to Antonio; he thinks that it is very important for Mario to go to school. He wants him to attend university and get a incredible job that will make him look good as well. But Mario doesn't seem to have an interest in pursuing a career in school. But in White Niggers of America, young Vallieres had a thirst for knowledge, he wanted to go to university to become a writer, but like many other French Canadian parents, they wanted him to go to a special school, Brothers of Christian, for only two years and get a job at a bank which would provide immediate income unlike going to university and waiting many years before getting a steady job. But Vallieres wanted more because he knew he was bright and he really wanted to attend university. However, before frequenting to school, he would have to go to the College Classique ...but he didn't have enough money. Why is it that the French Canadian father could not afford to send his child to go to college and the immigrant Italian seems to have? Luck? I don't think so. It must be the desire to be successful. It seems that the immigrants feel more threatened if their children don't get an education because they come from immigrated families. On the other hand, French Canadians feel less pressured because they assume they are superior and are bound to get a job in their society, but they're wrong. For example, many of the well respected jobs in Montreal are held by people who's families have immigrated here only a half a century ago. For instance, the Jewish, Italian and Greek communities are prime examples of what I'm trying to illustrate. An other point is that the ethic community in Montreal is very strong and practically controlling the economy. Another element that I would like to give my point of view on is the hatred and jealousy coming from the French Quebecers. For example, in Voiceless People, there was an extract that had Antonio's neighbor insulting and calling him bad names just because he was an immigrant . I can't really blame his neighbor because he sort of had a reason to get angry due to the fact that many newcomers took away jobs; these foreigners were willing to work for less money than the French Canadians. But many natives would rather go on social security which Antonio would never consider. This situation is presently happening in Montreal where people are emigrating from Bangladesh and Pakistan. Many residents of Canada are criticizing these individuals, just as it was happening thirty years ago. Primarily, the point of this essay was to illustrate the world views and mentality between working class French Quebecers and working class immigrants. These settlers from abroad have a very different approach towards life when they came here. Many of them chose Antonio's world view rather than seeing the world view through the eyes of the Quebecers. Outside this world of economy, the French Canadians still run the risk of being "extinct" by the overflow of thirsty immigrants looking for jobs which our employers will gladly hire. But then again, there will always be a Jacques Parizeau who will always find a flaw in all the ethnic communities who seem to work hard and want to become a success in order to make this country a better place to live in.